navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum February 08, 2012, 11:10:54 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5! | Lights go on in Sierra Leone
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: June 2010, great month for sun  (Read 992 times)
dhaslam
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 4374



« on: June 30, 2010, 11:29:22 PM »

Despite quite a lot of variation the average daily output was 18.4 kWh, 42% more than last June.   Highest output was 39kWh which was 50% more than the best day  in June 2009.     There was very high usage which boosted to output  on the best day, similarly  in May output once reached 37 kWh.   


* June2010.jpg (92.81 KB, 800x503 - viewed 254 times.)
Logged
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2089


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2010, 04:02:00 PM »

DH
I don't have figures I believe for my solar water system, but it has been a very good June for PV. In the three months April-June I have made almost exactly 1000kWh, at this rate OFGEM will suspend my account under suspicion of cheating!
Sean
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
desperate
Guest
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2010, 07:54:33 PM »

Sean

You'll be joining the Megawatt high club next Grin

Desp
Logged
noelsquibb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 712



« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2010, 07:58:41 PM »

Warmest June for 80 years apparently,  so we ought to be seeing a good power and heat harvest.
Logged

mmmmm,  gravy
desperate
Guest
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2010, 08:18:21 PM »

Strangely though the highest temps I have recorded so far were back in april when the airlines were all shut down, I wonder how important transparent air is? dunno what the relantionship between temps and energy on my system are though.

Desperate
Logged
desperate
Guest
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2010, 07:58:51 PM »

Strangely though the highest temps I have recorded so far were back in april when the airlines were all shut down, I wonder how important transparent air is? dunno what the relantionship between temps and energy on my system are though.

Desperate

So to that end I thought I'd do a little sperryment today. I've often wondered exactly what the energy input to the hot water cylinder is on our system, so to get a pretty accurate measurement this morning after various demands on the water were satisfied, I drained all the hot water out of the cylinder Cry Eventually the top and bottom readings were the same at 22 deg c. Then the temperature rise was recorded as so

Time     S1        S2        S3
10.20    28        22         22
10.30    28        24         24
11.08    34        27         27
15.07    59        53         53
15.30    62        56         56
16.00    62        57         58
16.30    66        59         60
17.03    66        61         61
17.20    66        62         62

So by my reckoning for a 216 litre cylinder that works out to an input of just a smidge over 10KWh, and an average power input of 1.42KW for the full seven hour period. For the more interestind period between 11.08 and 15.07 we have an input of 6.55KWh at an average power of 1.64KW.

I think that aint 'alf bad considering we had a pretty milky sort of sky with lots of high level cirrus/Plane smeg, for at least a couple of hours, and that is of course after  all the heat losses in the solar loop pipework and control bumf.

I am currently buying gas at 3.9pence a KWh, so allowing for heat losses in the gasser/heating system that represents a saving of 50 pence at least Grin

One day I will get the heat metering system up and running  and then we can see how it goes all the time.

Keep on rocking in the free world...............

Desp


OOOPPSS........stupid me ...it's July
Logged
desperate
Guest
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2010, 08:08:30 PM »

DHaslam

How do you measure your heat input? your peak harvest of 39 KWh seems like an unacheivable figure for me Sad I think we have broadly similar systems?

Just curious

Desp
Logged
dhaslam
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 4374



« Reply #7 on: July 03, 2010, 09:14:29 PM »

The output  is directly from the controller.    It seems to be accurate at low  output figures  because the  reading wakes sense compared to the usage but  is does seem to be a bit optimistic at the highest output.     On the higher of the two days with very high output there   would have been  nearly 700 litres of hot  or shower temperature water used, total water usage  780 litres for 24 hours.     In addition the heat dump was transferring  heat to the buffer tank in the attic almost all day.  I put the transfer pump on full speed to transfer heat more quickly but once the temperatures are similar the pump just stays running until water is used.  If the water used was heated on average by 25 degrees the usage would be about  20kWh and  both cylinders would lose  three or four kWh  plus about the same from the pipework between the two  so it isn't all that far out.                   
Logged
noelsquibb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 712



« Reply #8 on: July 03, 2010, 09:16:52 PM »

Get a government economist to do the calcs  hysteria
Logged

mmmmm,  gravy
KLD
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1340


« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2010, 09:45:47 PM »

Desp

as long as there is none or very little HW drawn off during the day, measuring the temperature increase in the tank provides a pretty accurate way of calculating the thermal energy. Data recording-wise I'm only a small step ahead of you, with four 1-wire sensors in pockets along the height of the tank, and readings taken every five minutes. Installation-wise you are 50% ahead of me, with my 40 toobs against your 60.
I've measured just over 1kW peak input into the TS for our system, so your 1.5kW seem entirely reasonable to me. It also agrees with the data on the SPF site, where they reckon 550W per 20tube panel.
Same goes for day totals, the best so far was 8kWh.

Interestingly, when you calculate the monthly total (in June I had 130kWh) and say that is for a 1.1kWp system (in photo voltaic speek), then you get very similar figures as are reported by the 'lectron counters.

Klaus
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!