Wookey have you read the book? I don't remember reading ".........there are no limits to exponential growth, or that the carrying capacity of the planet is infinite"
Have I read which book?
I've read 2/3rds of 'Limits to growth' and none of 'The Rational Optimist' (as I'd never heard of it before yesterday). If TRO agrees that there are limits (and that we are probably past some of them already), but goes on to argue that we can deal with the problems by rapid change, then that's fine and dandy. I got the perhaps erroneous impression that it was saying we don't need to worry and that there is no risk of collapse because 'technology will save us'.
I'm not attempting to critisise a book that I haven't read - I was just presenting another good book for consideration, which uses actual modelling rather than the plausible, but specious, argument that people have been wrong in the past so they are probably wrong now too.
And this Matt Ridley fellow publishes a book every 3-4 years - his early ones ('genome' and 'the red queen' are acknowledged as quite good). I'm impressed that he really is the same bloke that ran Northern Rock for a while - wot a busy man.
Monbiot isn't impressed:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cif-green/2010/jun/18/matt-ridley-rational-optimist-errors