Please try to understand the distinction between "sour grapes" and a very real belief that something is "pie in the sky" in
practical terms now - if we are to apply this "invention" we have to firstly understand how it works, what it can
actually achieve, and where it may fit into the grand scheme of things....... As an example, some years ago we heard of developments such as this in the field of pvs, that would allow ludicrously cheap panels, and the ability to "paint" surfaces with them - good, valid research, with something that sounds entirely feasible (just a reworking of a current technology)- but several years down the line, we're still waiting....
What you may take as flippant comments about halfpennies are actually backed by sound common sense - for a technology to be used "in public" it has to work, it also has to "user friendly" (no such thing as completely silent gennies outside research labs), and it has to be affordable. I would also add that it should repay it's embodied energy in short order, or there's little point in it......
I think RJ shows an understanding of the potential shortcomings - however efficient it is, it almost definitely won't give full DHW in the depths of winter without simply colossal and impractical arrays, that will fall at the hurdle of roof space and affordability (as do similar plans involving existing technologies).......
