navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 23, 2012, 05:43:41 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Paint it Black?  (Read 2186 times)
Stuart
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 653


Engineer ..... at large


« on: December 16, 2010, 12:05:52 AM »

Was just wondering if anyone have painted any external walls black or dark colours in order to capture heat from the sun. Every little helps...as they say.
Logged

8kw woodburner, Big piles of wood, 20 tube solar panel, custom tanks, back up gas boiler, North walls internally insulated
1968 landy that runs on anything and a currently wild meadow garden.

Nr. Tow Law
martin
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 11420



WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2010, 12:10:44 AM »

I think the problem is the lack of "one way valve" - my understanding is that painting a wall black will enable it to take in more heat, but unless you say pull down a mirror-surfaced blind over it as soon as the sun goes in, the losses will be higher too...... And sod's law being what it is, the time you most need the heat is in midwinter, when there ain't a lot of sun - midsummer there's bags of it, and the last thing you want is an even hotter house.........
« Last Edit: December 16, 2010, 12:14:39 AM by martin » Logged

Unpaid volunteer administrator and moderator (not employed by Navitron) - Views expressed are my own - curmudgeonly babyboomer! - http://www.farmco.co.uk
billi
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5397



« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2010, 12:28:08 AM »

sure dark blue was our choice  and an attached polytunel on the south façade



Logged

Guinness no Grid comes near

1.6 kw and 2.4 kw   PV array  , Outback MX 60 and FM80 charge controller  ,24 volt 1600 AH Battery ,6 Kw Victron inverter charger, 1.1 kw high head hydro turbine as a back up generator , 5 kw woodburner, 36 solar tubes with 360 l water tank, 1.6 kw  windturbine
dhaslam
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4561



« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2010, 12:28:43 AM »

Can be useful  on the outside of the wall, particularly west facing.   The wall heats up and acts as a patio heater in the evening.   Difficulty is that a black wall on an all white house  might be a bit too much of a contrast.  


* White.jpg (65.93 KB, 798x430 - viewed 406 times.)
Logged
Heinz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 494



« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2010, 09:23:57 AM »

as soon as the sun goes in, the losses will be higher too......

Why would the losses be higher? surely the dark colour increases the absorption of heat but doesn't affect the loss of it??

Heinz
Logged

"Do, or do not. There is no 'try' "  Yoda
martin
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 11420



WWW
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2010, 09:43:07 AM »

I remember my old physics lessons involving large black iron balls, blowlamps, and teachers muttering about "perfect black bodies" (to muffled sniggering from the back  -I still get thoughts of a starkers Halle Berry.....) Unless I misremember, if it's black it both absorbs and radiates more......... ralph
Logged

Unpaid volunteer administrator and moderator (not employed by Navitron) - Views expressed are my own - curmudgeonly babyboomer! - http://www.farmco.co.uk
Greenbeast
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 930


WWW
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2010, 09:47:28 AM »

Yes google black body radiation, Black is a great absorber and emitter of radiation
Logged

welshboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 614


« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2010, 10:00:28 AM »

To have any effect the wall would have to be thin.
Heat travels at about an inch per hour which is why Trombe walls are only 4 to 10 max inches thick.
Logged
EccentricAnomaly
Guest
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2010, 10:50:32 AM »

I remember my old physics lessons involving large black iron balls, blowlamps, and teachers muttering about "perfect black bodies" (to muffled sniggering from the back  -I still get thoughts of a starkers Halle Berry.....) Unless I misremember, if it's black it both absorbs and radiates more......... ralph

Yes, but is radiation the main mechanism for heat loss from a wall at night, or is it convection?

One of quite a few reasons why roof insulation is important compared to wall insulation is that the roof can be exposed to a clear sky (with an effective radiant temperature of maybe -30°C) over most of the hemisphere it can "see" whereas a wall typically "sees" objects of only slightly lower temperature over considerably more than half of its hemisphere.

Another question is what the emissivity of black paint is, compared with natural bricks or whatever, at thermal infra-red wavelengths.  I did read of some observations a few years ago which I could only interpret as meaning that green paint would do better as a selective coating.  Unfortunately, the person reporting this seemed to think that green was good at absorbing sunlight otherwise plants wouldn't be that colour (whereas the green colour is just an incidental consequence of the way photosynthesis works (Google fodder: PAR = photosynthetically active radiation, though a quite a few of the hits are about growing cannabis) so I couldn't get more details from him.

Some experiments with Ivan's thermal imaging camera or just an infrared thermometer might help.

I suspect a better approach would be putting a layer of polycarbonate or greenhouse film on battens on the wall.
Logged
DaveSnafu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2010, 12:32:55 PM »

When I was a lad I used to tune 2 stroke bike engines, we always painted the heads and barrels black in the hope it would cool better, (and it looked cool) don,t really know if it worked or not, we still melted pistons left right and center.
Logged

Proven wt2500,24v batteries,running house,navitron solar thermal integrated tank, 10 x 210w eclipse italia pv, wbs,
dhaslam
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4561



« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2010, 12:49:46 PM »

My solar panels seem to go below ambient temperature at night but I am not sure whether this is just inaccuracy in the sensors.   Even in December they can still reach 70C  while being cooled by the fans.    I think that for a black wall the heating effect would be far higher than the cooling effect.    One problem with an old house would be that the heat would drive moisture from the wall into the house so  it would be better to  use a panel with insulation behind.    It would be very effective in the kind of sunny weather we have had recently but only suitable for a house that doesn't already have high solar gain. 

Has anyone , apart from Ivan, used the Navitron ones.  They would produce some heat on dull days as well.   
Logged
skyewright
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 629


« Reply #11 on: December 17, 2010, 01:44:31 PM »

One of quite a few reasons why roof insulation is important compared to wall insulation is that the roof can be exposed to a clear sky (with an effective radiant temperature of maybe -30°C) over most of the hemisphere it can "see" whereas a wall typically "sees" objects of only slightly lower temperature over considerably more than half of its hemisphere.
That effect can be used to add a remarkably reliable cheap nighttime cloud cover detector to a weather station based on the temperature difference between the standard outdoor temp sensor and another that is placed close by in an enclosed environment (e.g. jar) that can only "see" the sky (insulation in the bottom of the jar helps). On a cloudy night the temps are the same, and once calibrated on a good clear night to get the temp difference for 100% clear you can deduce cloud cover by comparing the measured difference against the difference for 100%.

Quote
I did read of some observations a few years ago which I could only interpret as meaning that green paint would do better as a selective coating
I'm not sure if it was for efficiency or for aesthetic reasons but the house wall inside the "collector" on this Irish 'Solar House' looks to be a dark green:
http://www.viking-house.ie/solar-house.html
Logged

Regards
David
3.91kWp PV  (17 x Moser Baer 230 and Aurora PVI-3.6-OUTD-S-UK), slope 40°, WSW, Lat 57° 9' (Isle of Skye)
Dyslexicbloke
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 157


Blue sky thinking ...


« Reply #12 on: December 17, 2010, 07:46:43 PM »

I am sure I read somewhere that aluminium, despite being shiny, has a big difference between what it absorbs and what it radiates which makes it get comparatively hot in the sun.
Its better than some flat black paint apparently.

I only remember because it is one of the most reflective materials you can get when polished, hence PAR lamps ( Polished Aluminium Reflector )

That said I guess a silver wall isn’t overly aesthetic either and I don’t know if aluminium paint would behave like foil or sheet.

Possibly just the mis-musings of a confused mind …

Al
Logged

Off Grid - Big Caravan and huge enclosed gazzebo.
300W PV 12V system.
400Ah of AGM Absolyte GP cells. (Second hand)
600W Inverter (Maplin's finest :-) )
CHP in the works - Chinese Horisontal Diesel [S195 Generic - Kukje]
VAWT testbed flying - Back to that when its warmer I think.
Ivan
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1221


« Reply #13 on: December 20, 2010, 02:07:51 AM »

It may have a difference between absorbance and emissivity, but it's not something I was aware of.

I can categorically say that shiny aluminium absorbs heat much less than a painted black surface, as I've done the experiment in school, years ago to prove it, with tin foil.

But we do certainly get colours wrong - shouldn't domestic radiators be black? Roofs should be white? I'd say walls need to be white - in the UK we use far more energy keeping houses warm than keeping them cool. So heatloss during the winter should be our over-riding concern. Heatloss is lower for light-colours than for dark colours, so unless we are going to paint the walls with selective absorbers (expensive), then light colours are to be preferred.

Wiki(heat)leaks says (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_radiation ) that colours make only minor differences with radiation at everyday temperatures, but that Acrylic and urethane based white paints have 93% blackbody radiation efficiency at room temperature - which means that white houses might have 7% less thermal emissions than black houses - which would be a significant reduction in heating costs.

Silver is indeed a very poor emitter. I've seen this first-hand with my thermal imaging camera. A normal radiator looks hot. However, a towel rail does not look hot, except where a towel (ie a good insulator) is draped over it - which always seems a bit weird. The towel is being heated by conduction, and because it's not shiny or silver, it radiates better than the radiator itself. So towel rails with towels on give off more heat!
« Last Edit: December 20, 2010, 02:20:26 AM by Ivan » Logged

Navitron Member of Staff
www.epogee.co.uk - Solar PV & Solar Thermal Training / MCS
A.L.
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 321


« Reply #14 on: December 20, 2010, 10:03:09 AM »

Quote
which means that white houses might have 7% less thermal emissions than black houses
- black paints are not necessarily more like the perfect black body emitter than white paints - I would expect the difference to be very much less if any

Quote
I'd say walls need to be white
given the above are you not forgetting the heating effect of visible light absorbed at the wall surface of dark walls?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!