NickW,
And your point is exactly....??
I'm guessing it's more of your pro-nuclear monologue.
Of course it would be lunacy to plant the whole of the UK with rapeseed, so that we could meet 12% of our diesel transport fuel.
It would be equally ill-advised to believe that 2nd generation nuclear power is going to dig us out of this hole. It will be a case of too little, too late and too much risk for private finance to handle with the present state of the economy.
If they started laying concrete tomorrow for the first 2nd generation plant, it would be 2016 before it produced its first watt of power, by which time British Energy's remaining fleet (apart from Sizewell B) will be well and truly sunk.
Add on to this, planning permission, public enquiries and protesters and it will be delayed for several years.
There is no, one solution, and nuclear power can only cover one small part of the energy gap that we are facing - not much good for keeping the trucks on the roads.
Ken
Ken
My point is that as good as biomass solutions are, the potential is limited by the physical availability of land in the UK and the opportunity cost of planting biomass given that most land is already in productive use for food.
Pro nuclear
monologue
I'd have thought better of you Ken - Whilst I am pro nuclear I have never promoted this as a magic bullet solution. In most cases I am not the originator of the nuclear threads. I just respond to create some debate - isnt this what a forums about? I do consciously restrict these debates to the general discussions and am not so impolite to clutter specific debates about solar, biomass, etc with nuclear side tracking - that would be trolling. Its not me who has introduced the N word into this thread and I can assure you I had no such intention

As for solutions I have always taken the view that end use efficiency is the first port of call as in most cases the return on investment is good, the technology largely modular and without complication. I have expressed frequently that wind offers reasonably good returns as does solar thermal. Yes Im sceptical about PV if for no other reason than the fact that supply is limited. Additionally it would be better deployed in climatic regions where output is higher and electrical demand tracks peak solar.
I also recall expressing enthusiasm for CHP opportunities including those using biomass (such as Mr Lister?), or the mini gas / oil CHP units that are starting to enter the market.
Longer term I hope to see tidal and wave energy developed. As we are all aware that tidal is doable now and wave is in its infancy. Given our territorial waters, the wave resource, and sufficent capital this is very scalable indeed.
As regards transport I have been one of the biggest advocates on this site for public transport, home and flexible working putting my views into practice for myself and the staff I manage. IMO public transport is a much more sustainable option in the long run contrasting with many of the alternative fuel proposals for personalised transport promoted here.
I agree nuclear wont keep trucks on the road but it can power electrified rail transport and free up gas which is quite useable in HGV's and buses. Also it powers heat pumps which can replace oil or gas. Indeed France and Sweden have major projects to replace
oil heating with GS heat pumps.
Regards
Nick