navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 24, 2012, 06:24:04 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 3.885 installation Nr Cambridge  (Read 1299 times)
Mickess
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


WWW
« on: May 14, 2011, 08:34:31 AM »

Just found this forum.  Think I must have been sleeping as it has loads of information I spent hours trying to find.  I could have saved myself loads of time!
My system was installed at the beginning of july 2010 and so far I've been very happy with all aspects, not least the FIT return.
I have made a record of my daily production which I posted on a blog I've set up at
http://micksolar.wordpress.com/
Here's a picture of the 21 panels on my house.

21 Solar PV panels by mickess, on Flickr
Logged

3.885 kwp system using 21 x 185 ET solar panels on south facing roof.
CeeBee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 827


WWW
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2011, 09:09:50 AM »

Hi Mick

I think I recognise that system, in which case you're a few hundred yards from me! Look me up and check (and email/PM me if you want).

Do you fancy registering and putting monthly data on http://www.bdpv.fr/ It's great for making comparison with others nearby - so you can see if output is falling short for some reason. I see on your site that you've got plenty output data. I've had mine for a few years (unfortunately, as far as FITs are concerned - only get the pathetic low rate) so I've long-since stopped writing down daily output, though I do a real-time graph at http://www.viridis.net/rrd/combined.html, and some general waffle (which was more intended for the local Environmental Group) at http://www.viridis.net/energy/
Logged

Mickess
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2011, 09:28:43 AM »

Hi CeeBee

I saw your link to the french site at http://www.bdpv.fr/ while looking through some of the posts and I will certainly give it a go. I saw that there were 3 around Cambridge and yours looks very close to me.  I wish I'd known before I had the system installed, I would have asked to come and have a look.

I am still on a learning curve and had a devil of a job getting my wife to concede that solar was benificial to everyone. However now she's seen the returns she tells everyone about it.

I intended to keep the daily record for a year to see what it produced and then go on to weekly.  I have a Sunny Boy 3800 inverter but it doesn't have bluetooth soI take my readings from the generation meter so I can keep an accurate check on what I'm being paid for.  I take a manual reading and post it daily to my spreadsheet.

Mick
Logged

3.885 kwp system using 21 x 185 ET solar panels on south facing roof.
Baz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1386


« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2011, 09:41:01 AM »

Welcome aboard Mick.
That spreadsheet of actual output is really valuable to show the vaguaries of the British climate. You can't get data like that out of any of the estimation programs, or decent weather info in most places either for that matter. I'm sure it will be a help for people thinking of battery charging and off grid living too.
One little request is that you put the panel size, number etc on the spreadsheet so folks don't have to search around the blog for it, thus making it easy to factor for other array sizes.

Your interest calculations are interesting. Something you might give a reference to is the maintenance cost, insurance, inverter replacement cost etc, and perhaps more about the realisable value of the actual electricity generated.

You may have covered this elsewhere, I will have to read more of your blog this evening.
Logged
Mickess
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2011, 09:14:07 AM »

Welcome aboard Mick.
That spreadsheet of actual output is really valuable to show the vaguaries of the British climate. You can't get data like that out of any of the estimation programs, or decent weather info in most places either for that matter. I'm sure it will be a help for people thinking of battery charging and off grid living too.
One little request is that you put the panel size, number etc on the spreadsheet so folks don't have to search around the blog for it, thus making it easy to factor for other array sizes.

Your interest calculations are interesting. Something you might give a reference to is the maintenance cost, insurance, inverter replacement cost etc, and perhaps more about the realisable value of the actual electricity generated.

You may have covered this elsewhere, I will have to read more of your blog this evening.

Thanks Baz.  I left maintenace out of my calculations believing that as I also left out any grid supplied power they would balance out. My insurance company has not increased my premium to take account of the solar panels so that isn't a problem and I figured that if the inverter needed replacement in 5 to 10 years I would deal with that if and when it arose.  I'm not too concerned as in the time my system has been running my particular inverter has  reduced in price so if that trend continues I don't see it as a major event.
Logged

3.885 kwp system using 21 x 185 ET solar panels on south facing roof.
wookey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2672


WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 16, 2011, 05:24:58 PM »

Welcome to the Cambridge PV club. I've just been looking at the bdpv.fr comparison stats, and it does seem that installations are slowly getting better. i.e the newer they are the more normalised output they give by a few percent. So greenpark and morus (spring 2011) are about the same, and 2% better than mine (Oct 2009) which is 5% better than ceebee's (sometime in 2007?). These effects may be due to randomness and aspects of the orientation normalisation, but I suspect it's either the steady degredation of panels over time, or the the kit getting slightly better as well as cheaper (probably both).
Logged

Wookey
Mickess
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 17, 2011, 08:22:34 AM »

Thanks for the welcome Wookey.  If I hadn't found this forum I might never have known that Baz in the same village as me.  I now have to put my details on to the bdpv.fr site and find an easy and accurate way to get my generation figures automated. I'm sure I'll find the answer elsewhere on this forum.
Logged

3.885 kwp system using 21 x 185 ET solar panels on south facing roof.
Mickess
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


WWW
« Reply #7 on: May 17, 2011, 08:24:16 AM »

Sorry BAZ I meant Ceebee.  Must still be asleep.
Logged

3.885 kwp system using 21 x 185 ET solar panels on south facing roof.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!