|
Ted
|
 |
« on: June 09, 2011, 03:05:42 PM » |
|
From the 1st of August 2011, new entrants into the FIT scheme will receive amended tariffs as set out below: Solar PV: >50 kW – ≤ 150 kW Total Installed Capacity (TIC) - 19.0p/ kWh >150 kW – ≤ 250 kW TIC - 15.0p/ kWh 250 kW – 5 MW TIC and stand-alone installations - 8.5p/ kWh http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pn11_046/pn11_046.aspx
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Volunteer moderator 6kW Proven turbine, 20 Navitron tube solar, GSHP, WBS, Rayburn wood central heating
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Owen
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2011, 04:04:21 PM » |
|
Sorry, but I'm not going to take seriously any graph which uses the word 'levelised.'
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
44 Yingli 230Wp panels feeding into 2x Solar Edge SE5000 inverters .20x 58mm SE, 20x 58mm SW, Solar Thermal feeding 320l thermal store. 10kW heat pump. 300W of Hydro Power .
|
|
|
|
charlieb
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2011, 05:12:51 PM » |
|
What's wrong with levelised Richard? I wouldn't trust the Policy Exchange graph because they don't reference what study they took their costs from and at what discount rate, but don't have any problem with the concept of levelised cost of energy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Owen
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2011, 12:47:10 AM » |
|
What's wrong with levelised Richard?
Because anyone with GSCE English would know that the appropriate term is normalised.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
44 Yingli 230Wp panels feeding into 2x Solar Edge SE5000 inverters .20x 58mm SE, 20x 58mm SW, Solar Thermal feeding 320l thermal store. 10kW heat pump. 300W of Hydro Power .
|
|
|
|
Brandon
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2011, 10:57:32 AM » |
|
Ted, all, it was this bit that worries me most: We will consult on the comprehensive review later this year. The review will be completed by around the end of 2011, with tariffs remaining unchanged until April 2012 (unless the review indicates the need for greater urgency).
Brandon
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
changing the world, one roof at a time ..."We can't be B&Q astroturfers. That's one conspiracy theory too far. You should cut down on the pot." - Wookey
|
|
|
|
charlieb
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2011, 11:05:39 AM » |
|
What's wrong with levelised Richard?
Because anyone with GSCE English would know that the appropriate term is normalised. They mean different things Richard. Levelised costs means the total lifetime costs per unit of output levelised to current value of money; normalised means, well normalised. A study like that would try to normalise the levelised costs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
smegal
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2011, 01:11:52 PM » |
|
What's wrong with levelised Richard?
Because anyone with GSCE English would know that the appropriate term is normalised. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Hell, there are no rules here, we are trying to accomplish something." Thomas Edison
|
|
|
|
djh
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2011, 01:21:13 PM » |
|
normalised is a word, levelised isn't. normal -> normalised while level -> levelled
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cheers, Dave
|
|
|
|
smegal
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2011, 01:40:13 PM » |
|
normalised is a word, levelised isn't. normal -> normalised while level -> levelled
When do technical terms have to be real words?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Hell, there are no rules here, we are trying to accomplish something." Thomas Edison
|
|
|
|
Ted
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2011, 02:18:40 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Volunteer moderator 6kW Proven turbine, 20 Navitron tube solar, GSHP, WBS, Rayburn wood central heating
|
|
|
|
rondurrans
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2011, 02:32:44 PM » |
|
Wonder why they listed all the 'respondents'.........Freedom of Info. possibly.......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|