navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 24, 2012, 08:05:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2.475 KWp on 2KW inverter, North Lincolnshire  (Read 1409 times)
JamesE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32



« on: June 20, 2011, 04:49:22 PM »

11 Mitsubishi panels 225W with a Diehl AKO Platinum 2100S, facing just East of South.


* Photo panels s.jpg (89.38 KB, 1410x1057 - viewed 631 times.)

* Photo panels inverter s.jpg (70.73 KB, 1200x1600 - viewed 632 times.)
« Last Edit: June 21, 2011, 03:36:54 PM by billi » Logged
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2111


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2011, 06:33:50 PM »

James
welcome. And a Platinum inverter user. I am very happy with mine. Looking good!
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
pontiff
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 250


« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2011, 06:58:11 PM »

Very nice!  Get yourself signed up with BDPV so you can compare lecky production.
Logged
mespilus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 946


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2011, 07:12:29 PM »

Is that aerials shadow going to slowly move across the array?
Logged

Now in the HS2 blight zone
tange179
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 197


« Reply #4 on: June 21, 2011, 09:00:41 AM »

Nice panels Smiley

You may find that your winter production suffers from shading...

Is your set up based on a single string?

John.
Logged
JamesE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32



« Reply #5 on: June 21, 2011, 11:14:53 AM »

In reply to the above:

Yes I do get winter shading. With hindsight the panels should have been mounted "landscape" rather than "portrait". They are split into three with by pass diodes but the splits are parallel to the longer side. With partial shading there would still be an illuminated whole section(s) had they been the other way round.

The aerial - yes it does cause a moving across shadow in the winter. It's coming down in August when DSO happens at the Belmont transmitter - my loft aerial will fully suffice then. I shall have to dream up a new place though for my 2m Amateur Radio antenna.
Logged
JohnS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 898


« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2011, 11:20:40 AM »

How many horizontal rails are there on the roof?  It looks as though there is one at the bottom and one in the middle giving a large unsupported area at the top.
Logged

2.1kWp solar PV
JamesE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32



« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2011, 03:02:51 PM »

How many horizontal rails are there on the roof?  It looks as though there is one at the bottom and one in the middle giving a large unsupported area at the top.
Yes, most have the upper rail too low, in my opinion. The two offset ones in the middle are alright as they have their own top rail - I had these moved after initial installation when I also had the extra one above fitted. They have, though, survived on two occasions the enormous gales which we had. I think it's all to do with the ease of sliding the tiles up under the upper ones to attach the brackets and then slide the tile down again. As you approach the ridge you can't slide them up. It would have been better had I watched every minute of the installation and yelled "Oy".
Logged
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2111


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2011, 03:26:01 PM »

James
do you really have a Platinum 1900S? Are you sure it is not a 2100S? I am unaware if Dihl Ako make a 1900S (1.9kW). If so it will be a bit underpowered. Standard practice is to have an inverter rated at around 80% of the PV rating so a 2100S would also make more sense from that point of view

Sean
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
JamesE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32



« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2011, 03:29:40 PM »

Sorry, my mistake. It is indeed a 2100S which is rated at a maximum of 1900W AC output. (And 2100W DC input). I have seen it record a maximum output of 2050W on its "maximum yesterday" but I have seen an instantaneous 2095W. I will see if I can correct this but I may be too late. EDIT: Yes I am too late!
« Last Edit: June 21, 2011, 04:22:53 PM by JamesE » Logged
billi
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 5404



« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2011, 03:37:46 PM »

Hi   i did change it  (hope that is ok )

Billi
Logged

Guinness no Grid comes near

1.6 kw and 2.4 kw   PV array  , Outback MX 60 and FM80 charge controller  ,24 volt 1600 AH Battery ,6 Kw Victron inverter charger, 1.1 kw high head hydro turbine as a back up generator , 5 kw woodburner, 36 solar tubes with 360 l water tank, 1.6 kw  windturbine
billt
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 465


« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2011, 05:00:01 PM »

My very recent installation had a similar issue with the mounting rails. The first attempt had the top rail less than half way up the panels on the first attempt. The reason the roofer gave was that he didn't want to disturb the ridge unnecessarily, as it could disrupt the waterproofing. They did put the rail higher in the end; we'll have to see if the roof starts leaking!


* IMG_3750_edited-1.jpg (96.72 KB, 750x500 - viewed 522 times.)

* solar_panels_2.jpg (119.09 KB, 900x600 - viewed 522 times.)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!