navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 24, 2012, 05:17:01 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Could Pylons be beatiful?  (Read 675 times)
wookey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2672


WWW
« on: October 10, 2011, 01:47:08 AM »

DECC held a competition for new pylon designs. It's fair to say that the shortlisted designs look a lot better than standard pylons:

Pics:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/8762695/In-pictures-Pylon-Design-Competition.html?image=6

More details:
http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pylon_story/pylon_story.aspx

Some of these look nearly as nice as turbines. Probably not as cheap as existing (1927, apparently) lattice-tower design, but no doubt still _much_ cheaper than burying cables.

Bit short on technical details. Architects for you, I guess.
Logged

Wookey
GavinA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1190

Solar PV & water heating installer


WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2011, 09:33:06 PM »

personally I prefer pylons that won't fall over. I'm not convinced that smarties tube will pass that particular test.
Logged

at home | 80 tubes, 2 tanks direct PV powered SWH + 5 x Yingli 185Wp solar PV panels.
Philip R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384


« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2011, 11:42:02 PM »

Years ago, all the Tower designs were tested at the CEGBs Tower test facility in Cheddar, Somerset. Now long gone.

National Grid will almost certainly use a tested design, that is cost effective over its intended design life. ( Many of the present 400KV system was erected before I was a twinkle and during my early years), and still going strong (Most have been restrung with all aluminium conductors, new porcelain insulator strings & modified dampers). Therefore I doubt if many of the outlandish designs will cut the mustard. The only likely candidate will be the sort of conventional design constructed out of tube.

PhilipR 
Logged
Eleanor
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2232



« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2011, 11:53:14 PM »

Don't know if the winning design would have cut the mustard at Cheddar http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15293918
Logged

I'm doing this for free, please be nice to me surrender
"Very few batteries die a natural death ... most are murdered" stir
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!