navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 24, 2012, 06:13:27 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Rayburn Supreme MF grate bars  (Read 952 times)
camillitech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1867



« Reply #15 on: October 24, 2011, 10:01:29 AM »

At our last house we used to run a Rayburn on solid fuel. That used to go through a riddle wheel every 6 months or so. When we changed it to wood we stopped having to change them. Our Aga little wenlock is 3 years old & has never had a a griddle change (again with the wood adapter fitted).

Same here with the Squirrel's JM, new grate ever six month on coal or year if careful, haven't fitted one in the six years since we switched to wood only. 
Logged

http://lifeattheendoftheroad.wordpress.com/

12kw Lister
11m turbine tower
10 hundred ah 48v battery bank
900' pennstock
8kw woodburner
7kw Lister
6 bladed Rutland
50w of solar
4 and a half Kw inverter
3kw Lister
2 hydro turbines
and a Proven in a pear tree :-)

Raasay, 57 27 537 N 06
Baz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1386


« Reply #16 on: October 24, 2011, 10:11:31 AM »

This is a problem seen even in little model steam locomotives. The grate bars need a flow of air to keep the temperature down. You can learn a lot about the dynamics of lighting and retaining a fire when it is only the size of a packet of 20.
I also think during lighting if the cold bars are covered in ash any acids produced will condense out and be held next to the bar by the ash eventually becoming boiling acid which has got be a killer even if only for a few seconds. The sulpur in coal makes potent acid but wood still does the same to a lesser extent.
Finally I think "wood burns best in a bed of ash" is just an old wives tale. Have you ever seen a wood fire that doesn't burn better with a good draught. I think it developed from people observing that while wood can burn inside a layer of its air-porous ash coal ash is smothering.
Logged
laurence4fun
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


« Reply #17 on: October 24, 2011, 06:03:47 PM »

There's a lot of sense in that Baz.
We have an open fire and we were given a lot of conflicting advice about lighting a fire on a bed of ash. I personally have noticed no difference either way with fires lit on a bed of ash and fires lit on a clean grate.
I have however damaged the grate when allowing a build up of ash under the fire.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!