Thanks for the reply, Have heard of both of these companies but not really know the type of products they do (will be investigating) but again I would rather utilise navitron equipment.
Hi Rob,
I reviewed this topic a while ago so I looked up my notes which may be a bit dated but possibly still useful.
The Internation Energy Agency ran a project on combisystems that reviewed the commercially available solar combisystems. The results are a little dated as the work finished in 2003, also very few of the systems are available in the UK.
The best system they identified used a thermal store with the burner element directly embedded in it, which removed heat losses transferring water from the boiler to the store. It supports multiple burners, oil, gas and a they were piloting a pellet burner a couple of years ago. The thermal store also incorporated an element that minimized disruption to the thermal stratification when drawing heat from the tank.
http://www.solvis.de/6_download/6_pdf2/product-overview_front_gb.pdfhttp://www.solvis.de/6_download/6_pdf2/product-overview_back_gb.pdfOther systems use stratifying charging modules, the Consular one is IMHO neat using the buoyancy of the water at different temps to charge the top and then the bottom of the heat store. But the Solvis system allowed heat to be injected at 5 levels in the tank rather than just 2. The Sonnenkraft solution uses diverter valves and multiple inlets on the outside of the tank. So there are more mechanical elements to fail and heat is lost from the feed pipes as they are outside the tank. DPS's tank that uses an external heat plate and two inlets into the tank is also similar.
There is lots of background on combisystems as well as a simulation to compare different commercial systems in various locations available at:
http://www.elle-kilde.dk/altener-combi/dwload.htmlThis simulation is quite limited as it only supports the systems built into it and doesn't allow the modelling of very low energy buildings.
There is also a report on the state of the art for combisystems (in 2003), starting on page 5:
http://www.byg.dtu.dk/upload/institutter/byg/publications/rapporter/byg-sr0314.pdfOne of the key points that comes out when looking at very low energy buildings and combisystems is that the buildings only needs heat when the solar element of the combi system is least able to provide it. On building that need heat for more months of the year combisystems are more relevant.
Regards,
Rod