navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 24, 2012, 11:19:47 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: FITs consultation - please respond, and make your views known!  (Read 1179 times)
Outtasight
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 843



WWW
« Reply #15 on: January 06, 2012, 12:35:17 PM »

A bigger problem is the lack of people trained to do these energy surveys.  

Speaking to someone who is trained to do the reduced EPC for the stripped down home sellers pack, he told me there are no guides as to what the new certificate should include and next to nobody who can do the surveys and his basic charge for the reduced survey comes to a end user price of 50 quid.  The required extended tests for the PV qualification would cost the end user north of 150 quid as a minimum.  This alone will stifle demand as who will stump up 150 quid to find out they need to spend a grand on home upgrades in order to qualify to spend several more thousands on PV and then only qualify for the reduced 21p FIT?

The certificate surveyors were only sufficient for homeowners looking to sell their house.  Now a survey will be needed by some (hopefully large) proportion of the 26 million homes that might want PV irrespective of whether they are moving home or not.  Another army of "do-ers" that don`t exist but the government has mandated.

Lots of people he knew trained up for the extended survey and then the government changed their mind and relaxed the HIP (Home Information Pack) requirements, making most of their expensive training redundant at a stroke.

Just faced with the red tape (let alone the extra costs) I expect most to file the idea of PV under "Can`t be ar...".

Meanwhile the local PV companies are busy with their closing down campaigns...  First was selling innappropriate installs to people with the tag line "buy before the FITS are reduced!!!", and  now it`s "Buy before April when the red tape makes it impossible for you to buy!!!".

The huge drop in PV prices in the UK is partly reductions in base costs but also probably a lot of PV installers stock dumping before the crash.

Here`s a nice install that went up in November near me...

http://www.solarbodge.blogspot.com/2011/12/bad-installs.html
« Last Edit: January 06, 2012, 12:41:52 PM by Outtasight » Logged

http://solarbodge.blogspot.com/ also BDPV Production Graph (daily update)
2.80kWp & 400Ah LiFeYPO4 off-grid. See 'Cobbled together PV in W.Sussex' (in "Show Us Yours")
Ivan
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1221


« Reply #16 on: January 06, 2012, 01:45:36 PM »

Great points, and ones that I'd missed. I hope you put it in a consultation response. The problem with these consultations, is that the same few people respond and stuff like this gets entirely ignored because no one points it out. I never had a lot of faith in consultations, but I've felt it my duty to respond to several, and I was very surprised that a few of the more obscure points I'd raised were incorporated or adopted.
Logged

Navitron Member of Staff
www.epogee.co.uk - Solar PV & Solar Thermal Training / MCS
M
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 911


« Reply #17 on: January 06, 2012, 03:40:44 PM »

Ivan, just re-read my earlier post, and must apologise if it came over wrongly. It reads a little aggressive, like it's all YOUR fault. oops.

Only asked as I've read lots about the objections, particularly the farcical way in which this change was / is / will be eneacted, but have remained curious about the rates that pro PV would like to see.

I sit firmly on the pro side, but if for instance FoE would like 40p not 25p for example, then I see no way that PV can win back public support.

Sorry for the story, didn't want you to think I was having a go earlier.

Cheers.

Mart.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!