navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 25, 2012, 02:18:55 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: DECC have moved £197 million to the FIT budget from ROCs  (Read 277 times)
GavinA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1190

Solar PV & water heating installer


WWW
« on: January 08, 2012, 02:26:27 AM »

Don't get too excited as it's £197 million in total from now til 2015, so isn't even going to cover the existing over spend, but it at least shows they're aware of the budget issues and looking at ways to shuffle some more money about to it.

They don't seem to have made any announcement about it, just tucked it away in a table of a Q & A document they released on the 8th December and placed in the fuel poverty section of their website, which seems a bit bizarre.

This amounts to £14 million extra this year and £35 million next year rising to £89 million by 2019-15. Well, I say extra, as it's extra for FITs, but taken from ROCs, so no overall change for the total renewables spend.

Details here
Logged

at home | 80 tubes, 2 tanks direct PV powered SWH + 5 x Yingli 185Wp solar PV panels.
Ted
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2673



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2012, 11:48:47 AM »

DECC said this:

Quote
The spending limit for the Feed in Tariffs (FITs) scheme as originally published (and set out in the table below) referred to additional expenditure on installations of less than 5MW over and above the baseline of installations that would have happened anyway (because some installations would have come forward under the Renewables Obligation (RO)). We have now incorporated that baseline into the spending limit for FITs so that it is clear what the total spending limit is for FITs and the RO. This technical adjustment to the published spending limits merely provides a more accurate picture of the money that was always available for installations above 5MW and for installations below 5 MW. We have not made more subsidy available for FITs or less for the RO.

There is no way that that amount of money would have been paid out by ROCs (at 9p/kWh) to sub-5MW systems if FiTs had not been started.

If that was all allocated to PV systems then it would have required an extra 183MW of new installations just in the current year and, as we had less than 8.25MW of PV (15MW for all system types) registered for ROCs before FiTs started, this seems impossibly unlikely at an incentive that would have been less than 25% of the FiTs payments.
Logged

Volunteer moderator
6kW Proven turbine, 20 Navitron tube solar, GSHP, WBS, Rayburn wood central heating
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!