navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 25, 2012, 04:00:33 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 47p from April?  (Read 1939 times)
AlanIOW
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« on: January 17, 2012, 04:58:28 PM »

I have just seen on the BBC website that the RPI figure for December was 4.8%, does that mean we will be getting a total of 47p/kWh from 1/4/12 including export at 50%?
Logged

3.96kWp, 22 Sharp NU-180 Panels, Sunny Boy 4000TL, 15 Panels SSE, 7 Panels SSW, all 18 Degree Slope. Location - Isle of Wight. Live output can be seen here; http://pvoutput.org/intraday.jsp?id=2476&sid=1872
rondurrans
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 700



WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2012, 05:11:05 PM »

Someone posted this earlier:-

http://www.navitron.org.uk/forum/index.php/topic,16262.msg183953/topicseen.html#msg183953
Logged

4 kW PV Array on the North Wales Coast - http://energy1.moonfruit.com/
'Nullius in verba' & 'Nothing Endures but Change' (Heraclitus)
Laurence
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 167

The older I get, the less i realise I know


WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2012, 10:18:40 PM »

... or how long before the gov't makes another (this time retrospective) U turn, and reduces the payments to people who are currently enjoying the higher rate? And before anyone asks about the legality of making a change in the future that countermands previous "law" - of course they can do it - they make all the laws up in the first place. A change like this in five years' time - who is going to pay any attention to a few thousand winging early adopters, then? (of which I am one).

I really, really wonder what I am supposed to tell my grand children, when they ask me why we just kept on *&%£ing the planet up, when we already knew better... Maybe that's for another post! wackoold wackoold
Logged

4KWP on SW roof
16 x Sanyo HIT250 panels
Sunny Boy SB4000TL Inverter
Sunny Beam Monitor
Sunny Delight at making own Juice
Parky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 43



« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2012, 12:20:26 AM »

I really, really wonder what I am supposed to tell my grand children, when they ask me why we just kept on *&%£ing the planet up, when we already knew better...

I wonder what you would tell your grandchildren when they ask whether the promises made by politicians can be relied upon?
Or, should they ever go into business, would you advise them to commit to a course of action that the government clearly wants to incentivise and see happen?

An alternative answer is to tell them that it is simply human nature for our species to c**p in its own back garden, sc**w its neighbours, and *&%£ the planet up. We deserve all we get - even if the rest of our fellow species here don't. When I was a kid my Mum told me the planet's other inhabitants would be far better off without any human beings at all (and that included me). Forty years later I still think she was right.
Logged

3.92kWp 12 x Sunpower E20 + Powador 4202 http://pvoutput.org/list.jsp?userid=6527
M
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 911


« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2012, 09:54:45 AM »

Parky, I think your mum sounds very wise.

Let us make no mistake, we are not trying to save the planet. The planet will shed us like an unwanted bug anytime we push things too far, then spend a million or so years cleaning up afterwards. It's us that need saving from ourselves, Mother Nature is big enough to look after herself (and kick our backsides when we get out of line, like any good mother should).

Mart.
Logged
smegal
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 486



« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2012, 04:28:08 PM »

http://www.solarpowerportal.co.uk/news/rpi_increase_45.4p_solar_fit_from_april_1_5478/?utm_source=Solar+Power+Portal&utm_campaign=83d1139f4b-SPP_newsletter_February_16_20122_16_2012&utm_medium=email
Logged

"Hell, there are no rules here, we are trying to accomplish something." Thomas Edison
defiler
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 74


« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2012, 05:39:54 PM »

Interesting.  Is the 3.1p export tariff subject to the same rate of RPI?  That would make it 3.2488 - would this be 3.2 or 3.25p?  I think you could guess...
Logged
don0301
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2012, 05:55:44 PM »

Interesting.  Is the 3.1p export tariff subject to the same rate of RPI?  That would make it 3.2488 - would this be 3.2 or 3.25p?  I think you could guess...

3.2488 is still 3.2 to one decimal place Wink
Logged
AlanIOW
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2012, 09:12:37 PM »

Yes, they did round the Export down from 3.2488p to 3.2p, but they did round the FIT tariff up from 45.3784p to 45.4p, which with 50% export equals a total of 47p per kWh.
Logged

3.96kWp, 22 Sharp NU-180 Panels, Sunny Boy 4000TL, 15 Panels SSE, 7 Panels SSW, all 18 Degree Slope. Location - Isle of Wight. Live output can be seen here; http://pvoutput.org/intraday.jsp?id=2476&sid=1872
don0301
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


« Reply #9 on: February 18, 2012, 09:27:33 PM »

Yes, they did round the Export down from 3.2488p to 3.2p, but they did round the FIT tariff up from 45.3784p to 45.4p, which with 50% export equals a total of 47p per kWh.

actually, that's mathematically incorrect Wink

i think most likely they added:

45.3784 to 1.6244=47.0028

seems pretty fair to me Smiley
Logged
tc847
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 77



WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 20, 2012, 06:40:51 PM »

actually, that's mathematically incorrect Wink
i think most likely they added: 45.3784 to 1.6244=47.0028

don, i think i disagree on both points.  sorry.
rounding (no need to specify down or up) occurs mathematically to a given decimal place by looking at the next digit (and only the next digit).  0-4 goes down, 5-9 goes up.
and the 2 elements are completely separate and therefore are both subject to rounding to 1 dp of a pence.

The link provided in the recent post shows all the numbers.  45.4p for generation and 3.2p for export.

With such small numbers and with inflation set to reduce drastically (well, that's what Merv keeps telling us) we may not be getting any increase on the export side for many years.  {If RPI is 1.5% then the increase on 3.2p will 0.048p and so will be effectively zero when rounded to 1dp}

Cheers
TC
Logged

OSHpvgen
10 x Astronergy CHSM6610P 225W panels with 10 x Enecsys SMI-240W-60 micro-inverters 150 degrees 35 degrees
don0301
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 24


« Reply #11 on: February 20, 2012, 06:57:17 PM »

actually, that's mathematically incorrect Wink
i think most likely they added: 45.3784 to 1.6244=47.0028

don, i think i disagree on both points.  sorry.
rounding (no need to specify down or up) occurs mathematically to a given decimal place by looking at the next digit (and only the next digit).  0-4 goes down, 5-9 goes up.
and the 2 elements are completely separate and therefore are both subject to rounding to 1 dp of a pence.

The link provided in the recent post shows all the numbers.  45.4p for generation and 3.2p for export.

With such small numbers and with inflation set to reduce drastically (well, that's what Merv keeps telling us) we may not be getting any increase on the export side for many years.  {If RPI is 1.5% then the increase on 3.2p will 0.048p and so will be effectively zero when rounded to 1dp}

Cheers
TC

ah yeah, your right, the rounding up bit i must have misread.  45.3784 is 45.4 to one decimal place. my bad.
Logged
JohnS
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 898


« Reply #12 on: February 20, 2012, 08:10:20 PM »

Once again I consider that the DECC is playing fast and loose with the rules.

Inflation is calculated as the difference in cost between a given basket of goods at two dates. 

In December 2009, the RPI basket cost 218.  In December 2010, it had risen to 228.4, an increase of 4.7706%, rounded to 4.8%.

In December 2011, the RPI basket as 239.4, an increase of 4.8161%, again rounded to 4.8%.

Now if we take the original export rate of 3p and multiply it by 239.4/218, we get 3.294495p.  If we multiply it by 1.048 twice, we get 3.294912p, both of which round to 3.3p

Only if we take 3 * 1.048 = 3.144, rounded to 3.1 and 3.1 * 1.048 = 3.2488 do we get a number that rounds down to 3.2

Hence in my original post, which is on another thread http://www.navitron.org.uk/forum/index.php/topic,16262.msg183953/topicseen.html#msg183953 , I said it would depend on the rounding.

RPI will have to be at least 1.6% to get it to round up next year to 3.3p.

John
Logged

2.1kWp solar PV
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!