navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 25, 2012, 11:24:49 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Hello  (Read 5728 times)
ajstoneservices
Guest
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2008, 08:23:39 AM »

Wouldn't the paddle be best sited in a separate dip tube (into the effluent) where the gas is unlikely to escape from a wearing paddle bearing seal.
Logged
Bill2
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 8


« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2008, 01:49:13 PM »

I like the idea of stiration with the gas.
I was also wondering if this is an opaque tank? If you can't see the liquid level, you could run a site gage from the drain to the proposed effluent outlet. Different from the floating bucket effluent outlet, it probably has to be below the true liquid level, otherwise gas would escape and/or air would enter. It's a puzzle how to accomplish things with the minimum amount of holes. Or you could put an airlock on the effluent outlet, like they have on wine casks, but on a larger scale, or maybe pressure would be a better term.

B
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!