navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum March 12, 2010, 09:41:20 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Visit the Navitron Website for Great Deals on Renewable Energy Equipment.

Registration Problems - We are suffering spam attacks using some freebie email providers - eg gmail, yahoo etc. If at all possible, new registrations, please register using an alternative email address
 
Recent Articles: Retro-fitting now recognised by MCS | Bradfords Builders Merchants now stocking Navitron Solar Kits | Website untangles tariffs
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Willis solarsyphon  (Read 4994 times)
Northbridge
Jr. Member
**

Karma: +2/-2
Offline Offline

Posts: 92


....banging on about heat pumps again!


WWW
« Reply #45 on: January 02, 2009, 08:44:41 PM »

Cheer up. like other persons posting, it is an opinion, but one based on experience.

I havent said that they will not work at all, rather it is obvious what the shortcomings are.
Logged

It takes ten acres of willow to run Drax power station for 2hrs 30 mins.
Brandon
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +31/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 891



« Reply #46 on: January 02, 2009, 09:36:55 PM »

Me? - I'd sooner wait for the independent test results from the setup at Navitron HQ before leaping to possibly uninformed and plain wrong conclusions Wink

 not wishing to accelerate myself towards the point at which I have out-stayed my welcome in these parts, but

           
...independent .. results ...from Navitron...

They are flogging these things pretty hard, check your inbox for the evidence!

I first put one of these in one of our in-house systems about a year ago, and I too wanted them to work, but they are not the magical answer, it has since been replaced with (if I remember correctly) about £40 worth of PHE and this works as well if not better. Undecided
Logged

changing the world, one roof at a time...

"We can't be B&Q astroturfers. That's one conspiracy theory too far. You should cut down on the pot." - Wookey
Ivan
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +70/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 7022



WWW
« Reply #47 on: January 02, 2009, 09:39:18 PM »

Personally, I'd prefer a twin coil cylinder, but I certainly wouldn't write off the Willis system.

Like the retrofit coil, it will produce a small amount of hot water when there is only a little sunshine, whereas twin coil systems will just heat the bottom of the tank slightly (ie to lukewarm or less).Twin coil tank is highest efficiency on heat transfer, but Willis/retrofit coil systems will give more useable heat....as long as they are used with vacuum tube systems.

The installation is important with Willis - fit it wrong and it will perform badly - probably the cause of some or all of the bad reports.

I wouldn't say we're biased - yes we're selling willis solasyphons, but we're also selling twin coil cylinders!

So I wouldn't call them second rate, but definitely cheaper systems - which means payback will be sooner. Our Navitron demo system should be running soon, so we'll be able to compare the different heating methods (and we've included as many as we can think of!).

P.S Check out Paul's reports on his retrofit coil system performance - very impressive at this time of year.
Logged

3.54kW PV, 70tube Solar Thermal, 8kW woodstove, Veg Oil CHP (nearly)

http://www.epogee.co.uk - solar and renewables training
http://www.solarstandards.co.uk - industry association
wookey
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +60/-15
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591


WWW
« Reply #48 on: January 02, 2009, 11:51:13 PM »

I actually think the most interesting question is how does willis device compare with equivalent side-arm PHE - where both nominally do exactly the same thing, but the latter is a lot cheaper (at least for DIYing).

I don't think the 'second-rate' comment is fair at all. The considerations are somewhat different for commercial installs from DIY installs (commercial more interested in reducing time, DIYers cost, and commercial keener to avoid 'non-standard' (in general)). But if you want to maximise no-boiler hot water then PHE/willis is almost certainly better. If you are going to use boiler anyway, and reasonable proportion of hot water generated, then coil is better. For some situation in between it's probably a tie. if heating is involved too then there are a lot more variables. But the idea that all solutions other than a standard (in the UK) twin-coil tank are inferior is just wrong.

Logged

Wookey
Brandon
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +31/-8
Offline Offline

Posts: 891



« Reply #49 on: January 03, 2009, 12:09:54 AM »

Please do not get me wrong, i am not writing them off all together, but the claims seem rather grand when set against the performance that i have witnessed, and set against the cost then it is harder to justify.
Logged

changing the world, one roof at a time...

"We can't be B&Q astroturfers. That's one conspiracy theory too far. You should cut down on the pot." - Wookey
Flamethrower_
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +10/-4
Online Online

Posts: 698



« Reply #50 on: January 03, 2009, 12:25:01 AM »

I have to agree with Wookey, in September I fitted two solar collectors to existing Megaflow unvented cylinders by the use of Willis Solar syphons (rather than having to replace with twin coil stainless steel unvented cylinders really expensive!)

Customers are well impressed with the production of solar hot water in December  Cheesy
 
(The installations were 50 miles north of Inverness !)

By the way these were my first installations using the Willis solar syphon and I will say that YOU MUST FOLLOW THE INSTALLATION  INSTRUCTIONS RELATING TO THE NEED OF CORRECTLY POSITIONING THE INJECTOR TEE WHEN FITTING TO A UNVENTED CYLINDER as I found out to my cost.......! Otherwise all you will get is cold mains pressured water banghead



Logged
mick
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +36/-1
Offline Offline

Posts: 440



« Reply #51 on: February 04, 2009, 08:57:56 PM »

Hi all,

Any fellow installers got actual performance figures for the Willis's they have installed, preferably along with similar non-Willis set ups they've done. I am particularly interested, as were we all, in winter performance - we all agreed that the Willis would be fine in summer with a cool cylinder to work on. Nothing grand just brief installation details and upper, lower cylinder figures for a cold sunny day.

Thanks,

Mick.
Logged
Ivan
Administrator
Hero Member
*****

Karma: +70/-10
Offline Offline

Posts: 7022



WWW
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2009, 02:18:02 AM »

The Navitron showroom system is almost finished...
Logged

3.54kW PV, 70tube Solar Thermal, 8kW woodstove, Veg Oil CHP (nearly)

http://www.epogee.co.uk - solar and renewables training
http://www.solarstandards.co.uk - industry association
paddylen
Newbie
*

Karma: +0/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 15


« Reply #53 on: May 16, 2009, 12:24:00 AM »

Come on fellas - it's now May - any results yet?
Logged
welshboy
Sr. Member
****

Karma: +15/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 437


« Reply #54 on: October 27, 2009, 11:40:55 AM »

Bump - any update ?
Logged
peater
Newbie
*

Karma: +2/-0
Offline Offline

Posts: 27


A bad job good, Hired. A good job bad,You're Fired


« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2010, 07:28:00 PM »

Hi Guys

Well over a year since this subject was bouncing in the air. What is the now the general opinion of the 'experts', as many of us from the Heath Robinson Club, look for expert guidance. Has anyone any hard evidence of performance, as no one has posted such information (applogies if posted elsewhere), it may could be construed as a poor performance.  tumble

In Planning, Vaillant unvented vantage 200L storage, 2 x Worcester Bosch Green Skies panels, TDS10 controller, Resol pump.
Is it a Wallis and Gromet, or retro fit echanger coil (these tanks have the emersion boss at the bottom of the tank).   fight  Anyone with a similar setup?  garden

THANKS
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!