Celotex PU boards and Kingspan PU boards are effectively the same thing (albeit from different manufacturers), although they do offer a different range of thicknesses. A few years ago the Kingpan boards achieved (claimed??) a slightly lower R value, but their current literature shows like-for-like.
I used Kingspan TP10 on my current project. The foil facing was important to me, as it provides a vapour barrier, and makes airtightness easier to achieve (but if, and only if, you are totally obsessive about sealing the board joins with foil tape).
I've never managed to get a good deal from Seconds and Co., but that's no reflection on them - it's a hit-and-miss business as to what they have in stock at any one time. The most recent quote from them (about 12 months ago) was on a par with the price that I got for new, shrink-wrapped bales from bmdinsulation.com (brokerage based in Swindon).
The only disadvantage of the foil faced board is that it makes a fairly effective Faraday cage (if properly taped up) so mobile phone signals are attenuated noticeably

I can see how using tapered boards back-to-back could be useful on large flat areas, but I think they would drive me nuts anywhere that boards need to be trimmed to fit. Also, unless the board faces are in intimate contact, circulating air currents (in the voids between the boards) would have a significant impact on the overall R value, I think.