navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 25, 2012, 02:11:33 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Ministers to review councils' use of anti-terrorism surveillance powers  (Read 478 times)
martin
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 11441



WWW
« on: April 17, 2009, 09:07:53 AM »

• Reports of councils' abuse of power prompts move
• Snooper's charter charge denied by home secretary

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/apr/17/council-surveillance-abuse

"The government tried yesterday to quell rising concern over the abuse of powers designed to fight terrorism and serious crime, which some councils were using to target people who put their bins out on the wrong day.

Jacqui Smith, the home secretary, announced a review of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (Ripa), which the government says is designed to stop the powers being used for "trivial" purposes.

Ministers proposed that senior officials, such as council leaders, should be able to authorise the use of the powers and said the review would look at which public bodies could use them.

Smith said the powers were vital to keeping the public safe not just from serious crime, but also from rogue traders and fly-tippers.

But a procession of stories of abuse has raised concern. A family in Poole, Dorset, were tracked covertly for nearly three weeks because the council wrongly doubted their claim that they lived in a school's catchment area.

Four councils, Derby, Bolton, Gateshead and Hartlepool, have admitted using the surveillance powers granted under Ripa to investigate dog fouling. Smith said: "The government has absolutely no interest in spying on law-abiding people going about their everyday lives ... I also want to make sure that there is proper oversight of the use of these powers which is why I am considering creating a role for elected councillors in overseeing the way in which local authorities use Ripa techniques."

Last month it emerged the surveillance powers had been used by 182 district and unitary councils 10,288 times since 2004, but fewer than one in 10 inquiries led to a successful prosecution, caution, or fixed penalty notice.

The alleged offences included dog fouling, littering, illegal street trading, taxi overcharging and taking the fairy lights from a Christmas tree.

The Liberal Democrats, who obtained the details under freedom of information legislation, said Ripa was becoming a "snooper's charter".

Chris Huhne, the Lib Dem home affairs spokesman, said the powers should require authorisation by a magistrate: "For too long, powers we were told would be used to fight terrorism and organised crime have been used to spy on people's kids, pets and bins. Without reform, Ripa will continue to be a snooper's charter."

Chris Grayling, the shadow home secretary, said: "The government has allowed Ripa to become a snooper's charter. It was supposed to be there to tackle terrorism and serious crime.

"Instead it's being used by both the government and hundreds of local authorities to pry into all kinds of different parts of people's lives. It has to stop."
Logged

Unpaid volunteer administrator and moderator (not employed by Navitron) - Views expressed are my own - curmudgeonly babyboomer! - http://www.farmco.co.uk
Amy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3662


Karma Queen !


WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2009, 09:48:18 AM »

How poinient that this morning i have received a questionaire which asks for my views on my GP and surgery.

It states that it is anonomous yet it has a reference number at the top.

The whole of the back page is made up of questions about race, religion and sexuality.

I realy want to know what that has to do with the GP availability, cleandliness of the surgery and opening times etc.

I find the whole idea extreemly offensive and resent the nature of questions.

What can i do about it?  I thought about ticking every box and returning it. Maybe i could ring the premium rate number on the letter and complain to a retard.
Logged

Thank God for Charles Darwin. Another voice of sanity in this God forsaken world.
www.amy-artimis.blogspot.com/
martin
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 11441



WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2009, 10:13:27 AM »

On the racism question (for that is what it is!), I tend to do an utter Krakatoa - something along the lines of "how dare you ask? It matters not a jot or tittle about my colour or origin, if I were pink with purple spots, it has no bearing whatsoever on this survey..........." fume

As for sexuality, being a fella, the reply tends to be something along the lines of "not in the least gay, bacon, lettuce or tomato, but have been rather turned on by curvaceous chairlegs after a few pints....." whistlie
Logged

Unpaid volunteer administrator and moderator (not employed by Navitron) - Views expressed are my own - curmudgeonly babyboomer! - http://www.farmco.co.uk
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!