navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 25, 2012, 01:19:48 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Good Energy  (Read 3975 times)
billt
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 465


« Reply #15 on: October 12, 2009, 09:12:23 PM »

I don't really understand why you would waste a large amount of capital to install a system that's 3 times bigger than you need!

If the system is sized to match your consumption reasonably well it seems likely that the Good Energy scheme will be as economically viable as the nPower scheme. It looks as if it should be easier to administer. If you have a solar thermal system Good Energy will pay you HotRocs as well.
Logged
Ivan
Guest
« Reply #16 on: October 12, 2009, 09:56:06 PM »

I don't think you've understood the point I'm trying to get across. My system isn't sized 3 times bigger than I require - in fact it's 2.5x smaller than I require

My system hasn't been installed for a year yet, but it's very likely to produce no more than 40% of our electrical energy requirements. However, the nature of PV is that it is produced during a relatively short period of the day, typically, when consumption at home is low. It's also produced preferentially in the summer, rather than evenly throughout the year.

Despite my PV system being rated to produce only 40% of my annual requirements, 66% of the power produced between May and October has been exported.
Logged
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2111


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #17 on: October 12, 2009, 10:15:45 PM »

I am in a similar position. With no gas and a GSHP etc I need energy in winter - not in summer. Wind would be a better technology for me but being buying a suitable plot for c. 3 years. I am still very technically happy with my PV system - though what the new years legislation will bring I don't know.
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
Justme
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 2878



« Reply #18 on: October 12, 2009, 10:36:19 PM »

However, the nature of PV is that it is produced during a relatively short period of the day, typically, when consumption at home is low.



You need some timers. Just like people do to use more E7 power you need to max your sunlight power usage.
You freezer will work fine on a timer. Once you find the balance between the number of hours it needs & the spread through the 24 hours you can move most of that time to the peak PV hours. You can even do the same to the fridge but to a lesser amount. Then its the washer & dishwasher (I know there are some manual hot water fill issues with that). There must be other stuff that can also be on a timer to use more of your PV.
Logged

Navitron solar thermal system
30 x 58mm panel 259L TS
1200watts solar 120vdc
FX80 Solar controller
Victron 12v 3000w 120a
200w (250w peak) 12v turbine as a tester
6kva genny
6 x 2v cells 1550amp/h 5C
24 x 2v cells 700amp/h 5C
Total bank 4350 amp/h @12v
Ivan
Guest
« Reply #19 on: October 12, 2009, 10:48:55 PM »

I take the easy option - use the grid as a battery with 150% efficiency (in financial terms)!

Actually, in energy terms, it makes sense for me to export as much as I can  as daytime energy demands are high (offices, industry etc) and the carbon cost of supplying daytime power is also high. I can buy back electricity late at night when there is little demand - eg my dishwasher often goes on a 1am (no need for a timer!) and I'm using the otherwise wasted spinning reserve. Of course, if I had any sense, I'd get E7 and be rewarded for these efforts.
Logged
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2111


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #20 on: October 12, 2009, 11:15:17 PM »

I take the easy option - use the grid as a battery with 150% efficiency (in financial terms)!

Actually, in energy terms, it makes sense for me to export as much as I can  as daytime energy demands are high (offices, industry etc) and the carbon cost of supplying daytime power is also high. I can buy back electricity late at night when there is little demand - eg my dishwasher often goes on a 1am (no need for a timer!) and I'm using the otherwise wasted spinning reserve. Of course, if I had any sense, I'd get E7 and be rewarded for these efforts.
Yes Ivan
Get E7!  Dishwasher goes on about 4:00 am GAHP between 2:00-4:00pm  if solar not high enough - but ther are some E9 tarriff's I believe? Anyone on one?
 
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
Moxi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 293


« Reply #21 on: October 13, 2009, 05:33:27 PM »

I've signed up with SSE for the 28p tariff and we try (very easily) to export as much day time solar as possible, this way approx one unit exported pays for two night time units.  Generally this should result in no net payment eg income = outgoing, however based on very early production rates I'm anticipating a net overproduction in a year which will yield BEER money  Shocked

Well thats the plan anyway........

BTW clear blue sky's (some cirrus strata) for last two days yielded 6kWh per day from 1.44kWp.

Moxi
Logged
martin
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 11441



WWW
« Reply #22 on: October 13, 2009, 05:54:50 PM »

that'll be "St Luke's Summer" that's done that.......... (an old-fashioned name for a period of fine clear weather in October - St Luke's day on the 18th!) garden
Logged

Unpaid volunteer administrator and moderator (not employed by Navitron) - Views expressed are my own - curmudgeonly babyboomer! - http://www.farmco.co.uk
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2111


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #23 on: October 13, 2009, 06:13:01 PM »

Sadly no such luck here - heavily overcast all day and only about 1.5kWh....
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
KenB
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2691


Energy Self Enlightenment


WWW
« Reply #24 on: October 13, 2009, 07:39:46 PM »

I see that Good Energy are now getting involved with biogeneration schemes - from their website

The Centre for Alternative Technology (CAT) is installing a CHP system that will be fueled by waste wood and will provide electricity and heat for the site. The surplus electricity they generate will be sold to Good Energy. For more information see the case study at the end of this document.

It's a 100kW Talbotts gas turbine system fuelled from woodchips/woodgas. More details here:

http://www.cat.org.uk/news/news_release.tmpl?command=search&db=news.db&eqSKUdatarq=37160



Ken

Logged
charlieb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 522


« Reply #25 on: October 19, 2009, 07:31:12 PM »

if only Talbotts could persuade me that gas turbine will last then I'd consider mortgaging my flat (and some) to buy one of these.  Long term thinking is all about a woodchip CHP on the farm.  Ideas for heat loads?  (microbrewery, farm shop, greenhouses, steading offices...)
Logged
Ivan
Guest
« Reply #26 on: October 19, 2009, 10:06:46 PM »

Any idea of price? I phoned them, but they didn't know     facepalm
Logged
renewablejohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1847



« Reply #27 on: October 20, 2009, 10:44:09 AM »

Ivan

3 years ago I was quoted 250k for the 100kw machine however after further investigation it required 15kw just to keep it going and the net 85kw was maximum theoretical output. 2 years later I was at a conference in Leeds where the Talbot machine was discussed and the average output was less than 50kw. I am so pleased that I did not follow this method of generation.

Charlieb

I also had concerns of the turbine spinning at 85000 rpm compared to my generators at 800 rpm.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!