navitron
 
Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
UK's most popular Renewable Energy Forum May 25, 2012, 04:04:35 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address - following recent spam/hack attempts on the forum, all security is set to "high", and "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
 
Recent Articles: UPDATE ON DECC APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT | Yingli Green Energy's PV Module Ranks No.2 in TUV Rheinland Energy Yield Test | Navitron Solar Showers at Glastonbury for Year 5!
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Anger grows over FITs proposals  (Read 1213 times)
Ted
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2677



WWW
« on: September 30, 2009, 11:24:20 PM »

Investors who installed micro-generators before the launch of the government's consultation on Feed-in Tariffs (FiTs) have expressed anger that they will not qualify for the renewable energy subsidy despite being "pioneers" in the sector.

http://www.newenergyfocus.com/do/ecco.py/view_item?listid=1&listcatid=32&listitemid=3049&section=On-site%20%26%20Micro
Logged

Volunteer moderator
6kW Proven turbine, 20 Navitron tube solar, GSHP, WBS, Rayburn wood central heating
sleepybubble
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 988


expect the unexpected, then its expected


« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2009, 11:31:10 PM »

<qoute>
John Moriarty, assistant director of Feed-in Tariffs policy at DECC, also argued that people were not being directly penalised. He said: "We tried not to penalise early adopters. I think it is different from not rewarding them. It is not that you are being penalised, it is a case of people coming along now who will be better rewarded.
</quote>

Well there you go, the consultation isn't even over and the policy is decided... pretty typical for government consultations.
Logged

;-)
StBarnabas
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2111


St Barnabas Chapel (2009)


« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2009, 11:44:28 PM »

Ted
It stinks but was entirely predictable. Have worked for many years in big organisations where "consultation" is a vehicle for senior management to tell you what is going to happen. Many of us have installed systems for ideological rather than financial reasons  - I feel a bit pessimistic about the politics   
Logged


Gestis Censere. 40x47mm DHW with TDC3. 3kW ASHP, 9kW GSHP, 3kW Navitron PV with Platinum 3100S GTI, 6.5kW WBS, 5 chickens. FMY 2009.
Ivan
Guest
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2009, 12:23:18 AM »

In my response to the consultation, I indicated that this aspect is unworkable - if it comes into play, then I, for one, will be de-registering and then re-registering as a generator. I expect and hope that everyone will take advantage of such loopholes, or the government will see what a nonsense it is, and rectify the situation. I also asked the question, what happens if someone opts to extend their solar PV array at a later date? How do you know which kWh were from the old array and which are from the new array? It makes the legislation all the more complex.
Logged
Paulh_Boats
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2768



« Reply #4 on: October 07, 2009, 08:58:02 PM »

I see two critical factors:

The Government and its departments will be history come May 2010 - that's only 7 months away.

The Conservatives policy is that any accredited installation will be paid for the electricity it generates.

-Paul
Logged
CeeBee
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 827


WWW
« Reply #5 on: October 07, 2009, 09:18:47 PM »

I see two critical factors:

The Government and its departments will be history come May 2010 - that's only 7 months away.

The Conservatives policy is that any accredited installation will be paid for the electricity it generates.

That had occurred to me too. FITs (at present) due to start from 1st April 2010, presumably so we don't get stuck into another ROC year. Change of government expected around then, or a little afterwards.

As well as commenting on the proposals to DECC, I've emailed my (Conservative) MP with my comments, and pointing out that a new Conservative government might not want to find itself lumbered with ill-thought-out law. He's heard quite a lot about my solar panels already: first about planning permission (which was still an obstacle when I got them); then about OFGEM taking more than 1 year to accredit my installation. He certainly gave OFGEM a kick up the backside - got a letter back from the Director (or such-like) apologising for delays etc., and the system was accrediated shortly afterwards. Someone said it costs OFGEM hundreds of pounds a year to administer each small generator - no wonder if it takes them so long to push the paper around.

I still find it hard to imagine that the FITs proposals stand any chance at all of having all their problems ironed out and still making it into law well in time for 1st April 2010.
Logged

Ted
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2677



WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 07, 2009, 10:19:28 PM »

I'm going to a meeting tomorrow as a follow-up to the FITs conference I attended earlier in the year. The plan is to put together a group response to the consultation document under the auspices of the Sustainable Development Commission. I'll report back later.

Can this current government really last another 7 months?
Logged

Volunteer moderator
6kW Proven turbine, 20 Navitron tube solar, GSHP, WBS, Rayburn wood central heating
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!