Renewable Energy and Sustainability Forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Anyone wishing to register as a new member on the forum is strongly recommended to use a "proper" email address. Following continuous spam/hack attempts on the forum, "disposable" email addresses like Gmail, Yahoo and Hotmail tend to be viewed with suspicion, and the application rejected if there is any doubt whatsoever
Recent Articles: Navitron Partners With Solax to Help Create A More Sustainable Future | Navitron Calls for Increased Carbon Footprint Reduction In Light of Earth Overshoot Day | A plea from The David School - Issue 18
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: How modular wind blades are breaking the mould.  (Read 4018 times)
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 5570

« on: January 12, 2015, 07:26:28 PM »

By Darius Snieckus in London  Monday, January 12 2015
Updated: Monday, January 12 2015
The coming unveiling by turbine maker Enercon of a 4.2MW "bread and butter" design is on-message with the industry's movement toward upscaled onshore machines, but also points to another game-changing trend – modular blades.
The German OEM's E-126 EP4 turbine, a prototype of which is due to start testing late this year with serial production to follow in 2016, will feature a 127-metre rotor with two-part blades, joining the ranks of modular models from Spain's Gamesa, Denmark's LM, and UK outfit Blade Dynamics, all of which have commercially-available segmented concepts.

Blade segmentation is perceived by many in the industry as a necessity, as designs stretch ever-longer to enhance energy capture and boost turbine output.

Gamesa's 62.5-metre Innoblade is part of a growing body of evidence that the performance and aerodynamics of modular blades – if designed so that the joins "are a strength not a weakness", as Blade Dyanmics' David Cripps puts it – can be as good or better than existing single-piece designs.

Yet there remains a scepticism expressed by many specialists in the field. A project tie-up between Nordex and the German Aerospace Centre last year concluded segmented blades were still "non-competitive" with conventional models.

Modular blade designers make their case based on several arguments.

Fabrication can be fine-tuned for greater efficiency, given the quality control possible for 10- to 30-metre sections of a design that cannot be guaranteed by fingertip searches of laminates laid up in existing, single-shell moulds.

And as the industry moves further offshore, the super-long blades that will kit out the 10MW-plus machines of the future will need to be stronger and lighter than their predecessors, something that a modular blade promises.

Blade Dynamics' standard-setting 100-metre-long D100 design, being developed first as an 80-metre prototype for testing on Siemens' 6MW offshore machine, is calculated to be 40% lighter than a glass-fibre model of the same length, boosting annual turbine output by 15%.

Segmented design also affords easier access to the tip-end of the blade, opening up the possibility of building in "intelligence adding" technology – think embedded optic sensors that help the blade shed wind loads and high-performance light conductors.

But the biggest prize for developers opting for a modular blade is transportability, particularly to remote onshore sites that would otherwise remain fallow development acreage to bigger-rotored, beefier turbines.

Enercon clearly has this untapped market in its sights. Along with the modular blade for the E-126 EP4 4.2MW machine, it has fashioned a nacelle designed to fit into 20-foot-wide freight containers.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2015, 07:35:32 PM by stannn » Logged

2.45 kWp PV (Navitron supply), 40 evacuated tubes (Navitron supply), Clearview 650 log burner with back-boiler heating cottage and water, 2 off 50W border collies, 1 off 35W cat, 1 off 25W cat.
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 5570

« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2015, 07:38:26 PM »

By Darius Snieckus in Southampton  Friday, September 05 2014
Updated: Friday, September 05 2014
The supersize rotor blades that have come to dominate the wind turbine market in recent years are generally silhouetted alongside passenger jetliners to give a sense of their gigantic scale. Now it’s rockets.
Designer Blade Dynamics’ record-breaking 100-metre model — a slimline, modular concept on track to begin scaled prototype testing next year — will be almost as tall as the iconic Saturn V, the US spacecraft flown on the Apollo and Skylab missions between 1966 and 1973.

The comparison is perhaps doubly apt. Not only will the D100 blade be physically huge, it also has the potential to catapult the wind industry towards something like its own moon landing: the 10MW-plus turbine.

“Blade Dynamics is focusing entirely on delivering the next generation of blades through innovation that greatly reduces variation in manufacturing processes and makes blades more reliable,” says chief executive Pepe Carnevale.

“The fact is that real innovation is necessary if wind energy is to have a future. It is absolutely not the time for ‘boring’. It is the time to strive for economic, predictable and dependable. Scaling up conventional blades is what we perceive as risky.”

“Boring” is something the company could never be accused of being.

Its 100-metre “split blade” concept — underwritten by £15.5m ($24.9m) in funding from UK government-industry R&D body the Energy Technologies Institute’s Very Long Blade project — is based on a design innovation that jettisons conventional single-mould-based fabrication in favour of proprietary “non-mechanical” jointing techniques that bond 10-30-metre carbon-fibre sections into one lightweight, transportable, ultra-long unit.

The modular structure, high-performance tip and novel “corrugated” root configuration help create a structure about 40% lighter than a conventional glass-fibre model of the same length. Blade Dynamics’ calculations suggest that the blade has game-changing economics — annual output from a turbine fitted with the blades would be increased by around 15%.

“For the D100, the first half of last year was largely a phase of the project that looked at a whole raft of technology developments that were necessary to design this very large offshore blade — including joining technologies, advanced lightning systems, advanced aerodynamics, surface protection for higher tip speeds and so on, all of which was divided between our US and UK operations,” says Blade Dynamics senior technical manager David Cripps.

“The second half was dedicated to blade design work, and that included a great deal of analysis and cost modelling to determine the CoE [cost of energy] the blade could promise — to answer the question of whether this design was technically and commercially interesting.”

The root portion of a prototype 80-metre version has been constructed at the former Nasa facility in New Orleans where the Saturn V booster was built, while the tip has been manufactured 7,400km away at Blade Dynamics’ fabrication hall in Southampton, on the UK’s south coast. The root will shortly be en route to the National Renewable Energy Centre (Narec) in northeast England, where it will be mated to the tip and then trialled on the complex’s recently unveiled test bench.

“Made in America, built in Britain” to make best use of available fabrication hall space in southern England, the two sections of the blade have each been checked against a dummy tip or dummy root, to make sure tooling is accurate when they come to be fitted together.

“There is the issue of skilled personnel,” says Cripps. “We felt by splitting up the work we could reduce risk by not taking on a new facility here with a load of new people to build critical components.”

Dividing fabrication and assembly between two sites also resonates with Blade Dynamics’ supply-chain-centred manufacturing model. Its technology has been designed around quality-control systems employed in the automotive industry, with plans to introduce automation into parts manufacture and blade assembly “in the not-too-distant future”, in order to improve reliability, according to head of sales and marketing Theo Botha.

“The innate manufacturing variation of small, accurate parts is far lower than in larger components,” he says.

For an 80-metre blade, the modules can be up to 30 metres long, he explains, which is still “very large” for a composite component. “These are hardly small, but they are manageable and highly controllable.”

The root and tip sections are further segmented into parts “small enough that they are more easily controlled for quality but not so small that you have 100 pieces being assembled in a process that is overly arduous”,notes Cripps. “There is the additional advantage that these parts are of a complexity that they can be parcelled out as piece-work to smaller manufacturers without sacrificing reliability of the final product.”

Following an exhaustive programme of trials at Narec, it is expected that a maiden set of 80-metre blades will be manufactured for onshore road testing, before finally being scaled up to their full length for a future 10MW offshore machine. With no 10MW turbines up and turning, attaching heavyweight, 100-metre blades to a 6-8MW machine would be technically near-impossible and give scant insight into the CoE benefits to be had from the longer blade.

“You need a test model [of the blade] that allows you to gauge both the structural soundness of the blade on a rotor and its CoE reduction potential, so you need a length of unit that is compatible with the size of machine you’ll be testing on, you need a benchmark to work with,” says Cripps.

Building a demonstration blade for the 10MW-plus class “would be a big white elephant waiting for a turbine of this scale to be tested on”, he adds.

“There are significant design challenges that come in when you scale up from 80 to 100 metres in maintaining the torsion stiffness of a blade that is that long and slender, the tip-to-root response,” continues Cripps. “The structural requirements are substantially greater and we have made some interesting developments in overcoming these challenges in the 100-metre blade.”

Blade Dynamics’ blades feature more jointed sections than conventional moulded models, but use less adhesive because the joins are much thinner. The joins are also much wider, making them less susceptible to stress, and lighter. “Our joins are a strength, not a weakness,” underlines Cripps. “You just have to do it right.”

On a practical level, modularity means blade fabrication can be honed for greater efficiency, given the quality-control advantages that cannot be promised by fingertip searches of laminates laid up in conventional single-piece blade moulds.

And to speed progress in blade technology, segmentation would open up access to the tip, where “intelligence-adding” kit — embedded optic sensors that let the blade shed wind loads, or high-performance lightning conductors — could be wired in.

“People always seem to have a hang-up over the fact that we have joins in our blade — well, so do all blades out there. At worst, ours is no more risky than others’ [joining technology], and at best, because we concentrate to such an extent, our joins, being that ours is an openly modular design, have been worked into the fabrication process in a more integrated way,” says Cripps.

“Modularity started as a philosophy. Now we are starting to see the commercial spin-off — and the economic benefits match up well with the technological ones that come from quality control of mass-producible smaller sections, insurance against carbon wrinkles and so on, and this is particularly true in the very large offshore blades.”

Carnevale adds: “The fact is that real innovation is necessary if wind energy is to have a future. The opportunity demands more than linear, iterative evolution. Some OEMs are doing a fantastic job pushing forward, and now is the time to embrace the opportunity to lower the cost of wind dramatically using new technology.”
« Last Edit: January 12, 2015, 07:40:01 PM by stannn » Logged

2.45 kWp PV (Navitron supply), 40 evacuated tubes (Navitron supply), Clearview 650 log burner with back-boiler heating cottage and water, 2 off 50W border collies, 1 off 35W cat, 1 off 25W cat.
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 5035

SW London

« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2015, 10:18:33 PM »

I was wondering how long it was until they started making turbine blades out of carbon-fibre...

3.06kWp SolarEdge system with a split array:
2.18kWp 10x South facing, plus 4x West facing 880W

Mk1 ImmerSUN DHW diverter
4kW PowerVault Battery

Tesla Model 3 Long Range
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 12274

An unpaid Navitron volunteer who lives off-grid.

« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2015, 12:17:57 PM »

They are just very good posts Stann, fingers crossed!

An unpaid Navitron volunteer,who has been living off-grid,powered by wind and solar,each year better than the last one.
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 5570

« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2015, 10:42:26 AM »

Gamesa modular Wind turbine blade. Note that this article is 17 months old but there are some useful drawings and photos.

....and Enercon. Note that their blades continue the aerofoil section up to the root rather than ending as just a cylinder.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2015, 11:07:04 AM by stannn » Logged

2.45 kWp PV (Navitron supply), 40 evacuated tubes (Navitron supply), Clearview 650 log burner with back-boiler heating cottage and water, 2 off 50W border collies, 1 off 35W cat, 1 off 25W cat.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
SMFAds for Free Forums
Simple Audio Video Embedder
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!